Contact Author White House, residence and office of the President of USA On the one hand, political and economic reasons were mutually exclusive; on the other hand, these were overlapping To the question "What were the political and economic causes of the civil war? Political causes One political reason was that the Confederate States of America also called South wanted each state more sovereign than the federation, or confederacy.
The reasons for the Nationalist victory are both numerous and diverse but whilst military matters such as leadership, quality of troops, strategic objectives and foreign military aid are crucial to any explanation of the Nationalist triumph, these alone do not account for the fall of the Spanish Republic.
The inherent weaknesses and divisions within the Republican military and political system were vital to the success of the Nationalist forces throughout the war and perhaps most importantly, the attitudes of the European governments and the eclipse by the greater events in Europe ultimately determined the fate of Republican Spain.
Although the government consisted of civilian legalists who were appalled at the consequences of an armed struggle, the Republic had clearly made a fatal error in refusing to authorize the distribution of arms. This early mistake undoubtedly aided the insurgents in their most vulnerable days of the war.
Need essay sample on Why did the Nationalists win the Where the army and police collaborated, the military and civil arms of the Republican state collapsed, leaving the Madrid government with no means by which to restore control.
By the end of the first week of the rebellion the Insurgents controlled about a third of Spain, including the most important wheat growing districts. The early triumphs of the Nationalists had therefore been due to careful organization, the ardour and skill of their middle ranking officers, the defection of the Civil and Assault guards and the refusal of the Madrid government to arm civilians.
At this early stage the military balance was not as unfavourable to the Republic as the foreign press supposed. The strength of the Nationalist army was to lie in the fact that it had captured the allegiance of the majority of younger officers, a cadre which the Republic would find hard to improvise.
The military balance in terms of troops was roughly equal, with the elite, pro-Nationalist Army of Africa representing the key to the situation.
However, the crucial fact for both sides was that the Colonial army was still in Africa and the Spanish navy remained firmly in the hands of the government. On July 19th, General Franco, realising that the pronunciamiento had fallen far short of its goal, took the momentous decision to seek limited foreign military aid.
The German and Italian governments responded quickly to the request for aid, and by late July, German bombers and navy battleships were beginning to destroy the Republican fleet stationed in the straits. Once German and Italian aircraft had given the insurgents control of the water, twenty Junker JU52 transport planes were sent to Seville and Morocco, enabling some 24, Moors and Legionnaires to be rapidly transported to Southern Andalusia.
It was the failure of the Republican air force to concentrate on the destruction of the lumbering Junkers that ultimately allowed the Army of Africa into metropolitan Spain. The Colonial army was, in the early decisive months of the war, to hold the military balance in the peninsula and it was perhaps the greatest mistake or misfortune of the conflict that the Republic did not use its superior resources to prevent it ever reaching the mainland.
Any account of the Nationalist victory must inevitably include an appraisal of Franco as Commander-in-Chief of the Insurgent forces. Franco was appointed commander at the end of Septemberafter the Army of Africa had given practical proof of its military efficiency.
The immediate effect of the unification of military command under Franco was seen in the spheres of logistics and strategy, and the highly multiform Nationalist forces that entered the war were gradually transformed by a powerful sense of unity, which by the end of the conflict could be termed monolithic.
In addition, a delicate communications network functioned with increasing efficiency within the Nationalist zone, making possible the execution of complex military plans. Trusting more and more in his logistical superiority, Franco was able to leave whole sectors thinly manned whilst concentrating huge forces on the point chosen for attack.
However, Franco as commander was always conscious of symbolic or moral actions, always running his war with political criteria in mind.Mar 27, · Political and Economic Causes of the American Civil War.
Updated on June 28, these were overlapping. To the question "What were the political and economic causes of the civil war?" I assume the question is referring to the American Civil War.
Political causes. One political reason was that the Confederate States of Reviews: 8. Political Causes of the Civil War Essay; Political Causes of the Civil War Essay.
Words Nov 20th, 5 Pages. Show More. Taylor Gates IB History of the Americas 1 10/25/13 Pd. 1B These policies and parties caused inconsistence in the political system. The American Civil War of to was a battle between the Union Party, led by Abraham Lincoln, and the Confederacy, led by Jefferson Davis and was described as .
The Civil War affected northern and southern economies differently. When the war began, the north, with its large factories and well-established companies, generated a great deal of the country’s business. American Civil War Essay. The American Civil War. Words | 5 Pages C Fall Espionage at the commencement of the American Civil War was not an organized system; however the war necessitated the development of more structured intelligence systems for both the Union and the Confederacy.
Reconstruction After Civil War; . Feb 09, · Modern war is not an expression of innate aggression but an economic and social construction.
It is an attempt to settle, by violence, disputes over political power, territorial and ethnic issues, and societal stresses such as injustice and poverty. It is vital to address the roots of conflict.