Obut I'm interested to get more ideas on the subject, so I'm coming out with it. As is known Schopenhauer borrows and adapts Kant's Transcendental Idealism, reducing the categories to 1 space, 2 time and 3 causality. Both Schopenhauer and Kant take space to be an a priori form of representation, applied by the cognitive faculties to the senses. They understand this to mean that the propositions of geometry are synthetic a priori judgements, and are therefore apodeictic - certain.
It is obvious that, understood analytically, being reveals itself only as object, as beings. I doubt Berdyaev, or any thinking person, could disagree with this. Yeah, it's all about human beings If other animals have the linguistic, conceptual and spiritual capacity to conceive of truth and reality, then there would be truth and reality for them too.
Are you denying this is so? The view that there can be nothing without human experience isn't common to, for example, Schopenhauer. Being appears in it fullness with human experience 'human experience' taken here to mean the experience of a rational, conceptualizing language using being.
I also disagree that we as subjects create meaning - rather I think that meaning is always already in the world. It is obvious that natural signs would have meaning for animals, but they cannot posit that meaning if they are not capable of conceptual language.
I already quoted you what Spinoza defined substance as - that which exists in itself and is conceived through itself.
Now if you have an issue with that definition, then please explain what that is. Or indeed, please explain what "something more" could substance be?
Even God or substance must, at the very least, be conceived apophatically, through what it is not. Do you know what it means for something "to exist in itself"? Of course you don't, you only know what it means for things to exist for you. So, sure, as a negation of what it means to exist for us, we can conceive the merely logical idea of something existing in itself; but it cannot, discursively at least as opposed to poetically,intuitively or mystically, be 'something more" than a merely logical formulation.
So, it seems quite ridiculous for you to ask me what that something more could be when it is I that have been saying that it cannot be anything more meaning something more for us, rationally, mind to emphasize that again and have asked you to tell me what more than a merely logical idea it could be.
In other words explain what you think the in itself is ontologically, or in terms of being. You and Willow keep insisting that the in itself is not unknowable and yet you are both incapable of saying anything about it beyond its minimal formulation as a negation of what we are familiar with; a negation of the 'for us'.
The absurdity of your position is that the in itself is defined precisely as unknowable, as a negation of the knowable 'for us'.Critical discussion on Schopenhauer’s Transcendental Idealism Introduction This essay will present a critical discussion on Schopenhauer’s idea of Transcendental Idealism.
Edmund Husserl: The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction Dermot Moran School of Philosophy, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Critical discussion on Schopenhauers Transcendental IdealismIntroduction Essay Critical discussion on Schopenhauer’s Transcendental Idealism Introduction This essay will present a critical discussion on Schopenhauer’s idea of Transcendental Idealism.
As is known Schopenhauer borrows and adapts Kant's Transcendental Idealism, reducing the categories to (1) space, (2) time and (3) causality.
Both Schopenhauer and Kant take space to be an a priori form of representation, applied by the cognitive faculties to the senses. 1. Life: – Exactly a month younger than the English Romantic poet, Lord Byron (–), who was born on January 22, , Arthur Schopenhauer came into the world on February 22, in Danzig [Gdansk, Poland] — a city that had a long history in international trade as a member of the Hanseatic League.
schelling transcendental idealism pdf Biographia Literaria where he introduced Schellings transcendental caninariojana.com, Fichte, Hegel, and Schelling are all discussed in detail, together.